Ever since I was featured in the Dove 3R announcement ad late last year, I’ve received a few emails from fellow photographers and enthusiasts asking photography related questions.
I’m not an expert on all things technical but I have replied to these emails on what I know and have learnt so far. The emails from fellow photographers have never stopped and it surprises me that people ask me photography related questions when I myself am still learning as well :p
But I’m more than happy to share what I know
(as for the stuff I don’t know, I’ll refer you to the experts :p). To make things more convenient, I’ve decided to start a category ‘For Photographers’ so that I don’t have to keep on repeating myself like a broken recorder in emails :p
One of the most frequent question I’ve received is “What gear do you use when you shoot weddings?”.
I was a bit shy to answer that question initially as I felt like what I had wasn’t as good as what establised photographers in the industry were carrying around. Then I thought, bugger it. As long as my shots turns out decent who cares what gear I use.
Picture of me slacking off (i kid, i kiiiiid) during Amy & Terence’s wedding shot by Amy’s brother, Alex. Here I am with my 2 boyfriends - Onni and Paco.

For weddings, I would usually bring along my whole ‘arsenal’ of gear and this includes;
- 40D and 400D camera bodies (with the names of Onni and Paco respectively ;D)
- 24-70mm, f2.8
- 10-22mm
- 50mm, f1.4
- 100mm, f2.8 macro
- 580EX Flash
- 3×2GB CF Card and 2×1GB CF Card
- extra batteries!!
Of course, I don’t carry the whole shebang with me throughout the wedding. That would be absolutely suicidal! :p
The 100mm would usually be used for macro and detail shots taken during the preparation period and the 50mm would be used when I’m taking casual portraits of the couple prior to the start of the reception.
Throughout a wedding ceremony and reception, I would use the 24-70mm on my 40D and the 10-22mm on my 400D. This saves me from having to change lenses in the middle of the ceremony and I also get two different perspective at the same time.
For those who are just venturing into wedding photography but do not (yet!) have the budget to invest into fast lenses, you might wanna start off with the Tamron 17-50mm, f2.8 first.
No doubt, it is a third party lens and might not be as fast and sharp as a Canon lens but if budget is your main concern, then that’s something I would recommend. I actually shot my first few weddings with that lens. If you were to check out my ‘Weddings’ set on my flickr here, the first 3 rows of pics were shot with that lens.
BUT it would be better if you can save up for a fast lens as IMHO, it makes a big difference in terms of speed and quality. I used my Tamron for about 6 months and then I got ‘poisoned’ by Glenn who loaned me his 28-70mm, f2.8 (the version before the 24-70mm) for Daphne’s wedding.
Some examples can be seen below;
Bouquet shot with 50mm at f.14, ISO400, 1/1250

Shot with the same 50mm lens BUT I took the lens off the camera body, turned it around and turned it into a macro lens :p ISO400, 1/500

Using the 100mm macro lens at f2.8, ISO400, 1/250 sec

10-22mm at 10mm, f4.5, ISO400, 1/13

24-70mm at 30mm, f2.8, ISO400, 1/30 with bounce flash

Hope the above information was helpful to those who had sent me an email and who have previously left questions on my flickr and comment on my blog.
Thanks for taking the time to leave a question tho
It’s nice to know I’m not talking to myself in the blogosphere…or whatever you call it.